1858 stories
·
15 followers

How Casinos Enable Gambling Addicts - The Atlantic

1 Share
Read the whole story
iridesce
4 days ago
reply
DC
Share this story
Delete

Opinion: How tenant unions are finding power in numbers to fight L.A.'s housing crisis - Los Angeles Times

1 Share

Many Los Angeles residents struggle to stay in their homes. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the city instituted a moratorium on evictions. Since those restrictions ended in April 2023, evictions have skyrocketed well past pre-pandemic levels. According to the L.A. city controller’s data, landlords filed 5,652 evictions in December alone.

The city’s answer is to send tenants to the courts and provide them with bare-bones legal representation. Yet few people have actually gotten access to an attorney to help them fight eviction, and even then, burdened with excessive caseloads, these lawyers negotiate measly sums in exchange for tenants’ relocation rather than fighting for them to stay in their homes.

But what if tenants fought their own battles in their own homes and in their own neighborhoods? As scholars studying the history of housing in L.A. and as organizers with the Union de Vecinos, a local branch of the Los Angeles Tenants Union, we have found that tenant unions are leading a more effective response to the region’s housing crisis.

In a tenant union, residents of an apartment complex join forces to represent their interests as a collective. Unlike the city’s delayed response to housing problems — which occurs only once residents reach the eviction stage or arrive at the courts — tenant unions are proactive. They negotiate directly with landlords and carry out protests, rent strikes, community events and other strategies to help protect their homes. And tenants get to be part of the conversation in solving the city’s housing woes.

There’s a long history of these unions leveraging their power in numbers.

In New York from 1917 to 1929, tenants used rent strikes to demand control over the quality and price of their homes — primarily by securing rent control. In our research, we discovered that by the 1960s and 1970s, poor tenants in public housing projects across the United States — from East St. Louis to San Francisco — organized. They used their collective power to push states to invest in making the projects habitable instead of just tearing them down.

Los Angeles has seen similar efforts. Since the 1990s, Union de Vecinos (neighbors’ union) has organized the primarily Latino, working-class community of Boyle Heights into committees that have used tactics such as community cleanups, rent strikes and protests to successfully fight gentrification. In 2015, Union de Vecinos helped found the Los Angeles Tenants Union, which now counts its membership across the city in the thousands and continues to win tenants the right to stay in their homes.

New local tenant union chapters have sprouted, including, most recently, among very low-income tenants living in downtown L.A.’s single-room occupancy hotels, the housing of last resort for many of the poorest Angelenos. Without consulting tenants, the city has plans to demolish SROs. But the tenants we’ve met have other ideas: organizing to demand not only that the historic hotels remain but also that they live up to their promise of providing safe, clean and healthy housing for low-income people.

We’ve seen how tenants can curb plans to destroy existing low-income and rent-controlled housing. Last year in Boyle Heights, for example, a tenant association in Union de Vecinos discovered its rent-controlled building was slated for demolition to make way for a mixed-use housing development. But the tenant association was able to push L.A. City Councilmember Kevin De León to institute an interim ordinance to halt demolitions in the neighborhood.

COVID-19 eviction moratoriums at the federal, state and local levels cracked open a window of possibility for tenants facing displacement: Temporarily protected from evictions during the pandemic, they had time to organize, putting them in a better position to fight for their homes in the future. Across the country, tenant unions have blossomed, knitted together nationally through the Autonomous Tenants Union Network.

But tenants continue to face challenges, especially in Los Angeles, where several pandemic-era renter protection programs have ended. L.A. should formalize tenants’ power over their homes by reducing landlords’ power to evict, and by using eminent domain and other means to expropriate property from slumlords and transfer legal ownership to the tenants.

The tenant association at Hillside Villa, a 124-home apartment building in Chinatown, has been demanding this for years. The L.A. housing authority was slated to buy the property and then transfer ownership to the tenants, which would have saved them from a huge rent hike that, in practice, meant a mass eviction. But the city has dragged its feet. Now residents face eviction. The city could still step in and prevent hundreds of families from losing their homes.

The city should move toward policies that yield housing to the people who already inhabit it. Tenant unions are much more effective than landlords at solving precarious housing issues by preserving and enforcing renters’ rights, ensuring good living conditions and keeping tenants housed. In the state of emergency that constitutes L.A.’s housing crisis, city and county officials should begin to listen to and work with residents, whose voices will only be growing louder. Only tenants can point the way to solutions that actually address the root causes of the housing crisis in a system that prioritizes the right to own property over the right to have a home.

Annie Powers is an organizer with Union de Vecinos and a PhD candidate in history at UCLA. Leonardo Vilchis-Zarate is an organizer with Union de Vecinos and a PhD student in Chicano/Central American Studies at UCLA. @lvilchisz

Read the whole story
iridesce
5 days ago
reply
DC
Share this story
Delete

Three students expelled following Student Accountability hearings, faculty criticize university response - The Vanderbilt Hustler

1 Share

UPDATED: This piece was updated on April 6 at 1:17 p.m. CDT to include information and comments shared publicly on X by one of the expelled students.

Three students have been expelled, one suspended and 22 issued disciplinary probations following a week of preliminary hearings involving the 27 students suspended for their involvement in a sit-in protest at Kirkland Hall, according to the Vanderbilt Divest Coalition. In an April 5 email to the Vanderbilt community, Provost C. Cybele Raver shared that students have 10 days to appeal their cases, during which they are permitted access to campus and university resources.

In an open letter to Chancellor Daniel Diermeier, Raver, the Office of General Counsel and Faculty Senate President Andrea Capizzi, faculty members criticized actions taken by the administration throughout the month of March, including the distribution of interim suspensions to student protesters. As of publication, the letter has been signed by 154 professors. 

Vanderbilt Law School Associate Professor Terry Maroney, one of the letter’s signees, condemned what she said she and several faculty view as the university’s “overly punitive” disciplinary response. 

“Some of us participated in similar sit-ins in our own day; they form part of the protest lexicon. And while such civil disobedience carries consequences, the consequences our administrators have chosen — including expulsion and criminal charges — are draconian,” Maroney said. “We call on the Chancellor to change course.”

Accountability process outcomes

Preliminary hearings began on March 28 and continued through this week. Raver’s email cited the goal of the university’s student conduct policies as ensuring student safety and opportunity for success.

“After a thorough review of the incident, including examination of evidence and interviews with students, the Student Accountability, Community Standards and Academic Integrity staff issued a range of findings and sanctions that took the individual circumstances of each student’s conduct into account,” the email reads.

The university declined to share the specific number of students issued probations, suspensions and expulsions, citing federal privacy laws. However, a joint Instagram post by the Vanderbilt Divest Coalition and Columbia University’s Students for Justice in Palestine chapter made this information publicly available.

“Student disciplinary outcomes are considered part of an individual student’s educational record, the contents of which are protected by federal privacy laws. We cannot release information that would make a student, or group of students, identifiable,” a university representative told The Hustler.

VDC’s post shared that all students issued disciplinary action are filing appeals for their cases. During the 10-day appeal window, students will be able to return to classes and access support for “mental health, academic progress and welfare.”

“All students are going through the appeal process to rectify these grossly oppressive decisions from administration,” the post reads.

First-year Jack Petocz, one of the students issued an expulsion, took to X to condemn the severity of the university’s response.

“Vanderbilt will let sexual assaulters walk free but expel passionate organizers,” Petocz tweeted. “I came to Vanderbilt with the dream of escaping the rampant bigotry and institutional repression I experienced in the Deep South. That dream has soured.”

The coalition has also coordinated a campus-wide walkout for April 8 at 12 p.m. CDT, beginning at Library Lawn. In their post, they criticized Chancellor Daniel Diermeier for being “notoriously cruel to student protestors,” citing his past writings on countering social activism and managing corporate reputations.

Raver thanked the Vanderbilt community for coming together to advance the university’s “educative mission” amid “difficult circumstances.”

“The gravity of this situation and these outcomes weighs heavily on those of us charged with carrying out our responsibility as leaders; we fully understand that student choices and decisions can lead to serious and costly consequences,” her email reads.

Faculty open letter

In the open letter, faculty members said they have been “deeply troubled” by the university’s actions over the past two weeks in response to student protests surrounding the administration’s cancellation of the referendum for the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions amendment proposed to VSG. The letter was publicly signed by 105 faculty members, with an additional 49 who chose to remain anonymous.

“We hold a range of perspectives on this topic and on the BDS campaign at the heart of the recent protests,” the letter reads. “However, in our shared view, the administration’s response to student activism on this issue is inconsistent with Vanderbilt’s commitment to free speech and expression in a democratic society.”

The faculty expressed concern for the “suppression of student activism and speech” on campus, saying that the university has restricted student actions in ways that are “excessive and punitive.”

“The administration has confined student expression to a dwindling number of bulletin boards, locations and approved time slots, with implications that should alarm the Vanderbilt community,” the letter reads.

The letter also acknowledges the correspondence sent to Diermeier by the Metropolitan Council of Nashville, as well as the arrest of Nashville Scene reporter Eli Motycka.

“We are troubled that the administration’s suppression of student speech on campus and its treatment of a peaceful journalist have threatened Vanderbilt’s standing and reputation within the broader Nashville community and possibly beyond,” the letter reads.

The faculty members expressed support for students involved in the protests over the past month, condemning the university’s “implied characterization” of the protests as a threat to safety.

“We call on the administration to repeal all suspensions and criminal charges against the students and immediately reinstate their access to campus housing, meal plans, healthcare, and educational activities,” the letter reads. “Finally, we urge the administration to align its policies with its values regarding free speech, expression, and democratic activities, including protest.”

Assistant Professor of Anthropology Carwil Bjork-James expressed disappointment with the way the university responded to the protestors who participated in the sit-in, saying he believes leaders in a democracy should be open to disagreements.

“Chancellor Diermeier met our students not with dialogue but with security guards. And now the university has responded to a time-honored protest tactic, the sit-in, with punishment and expulsion,” Bjork-James said. “Our students stood up during a moral crisis, and we are failing them.”

Read the whole story
iridesce
5 days ago
reply
DC
Share this story
Delete

Trump’s bizarre, vindictive incoherence has to be heard in full to be believed | Donald Trump | The Guardian

1 Share

Donald Trump’s speeches on the 2024 campaign trail so far have been focused on a laundry list of complaints, largely personal, and an increasingly menacing tone.

He’s on the campaign trail less these days than he was in previous cycles – and less than you’d expect from a guy with dedicated superfans who brags about the size of his crowds every chance he gets. But when he has held rallies, he speaks in dark, dehumanizing terms about migrants, promising to vanquish people crossing the border. He rails about the legal battles he faces and how they’re a sign he’s winning, actually. He tells lies and invents fictions. He calls his opponent a threat to democracy and claims this election could be the last one.

Trump’s tone, as many have noted, is decidedly more vengeful this time around, as he seeks to reclaim the White House after a bruising loss that he insists was a steal. This alone is a cause for concern, foreshadowing what the Trump presidency redux could look like. But he’s also, quite frequently, rambling and incoherent, running off on tangents that would grab headlines for their oddness should any other candidate say them.

Journalists rightly chose not to broadcast Trump’s entire speeches after 2016, believing that the free coverage helped boost the former president and spread lies unchecked. But now there’s the possibility that stories about his speeches often make his ideas appear more cogent than they aremaking the case that, this time around, people should hear the full speeches to understand how Trump would govern again.

Watching a Trump speech in full better shows what it’s like inside his head: a smorgasbord of falsehoods, personal and professional vendettas, frequent comparisons to other famous people, a couple of handfuls of simple policy ideas, and a lot of non sequiturs that veer into barely intelligible stories.

Curiously, Trump tucks the most tangible policy implications in at the end. His speeches often finish with a rundown of what his second term in office could bring, in a meditation-like recitation the New York Times recently compared to a sermon. Since these policies could become reality, here’s a few of those ideas:

  • Instituting the death penalty for drug dealers.

  • Creating the “Trump Reciprocal Trade Act”: “If China or any other country makes us pay 100% or 200% tariff, which they do, we will make them pay a reciprocal tariff of 100% or 200%. In other words, you screw us and we’ll screw you.”

  • Indemnifying all police officers and law enforcement officials.

  • Rebuilding cities and taking over Washington DC, where, he said in a recent speech, there are “beautiful columns” put together “through force of will” because there were no “Caterpillar tractors” and now those columns have graffiti on them.

  • Issuing an executive order to cut federal funding for any school pushing critical race theory, transgender and other inappropriate racial, sexual or political content.

  • Moving to one-day voting with paper ballots and voter ID.

This conclusion is the most straightforward part of a Trump speech and is typically the extent of what a candidate for office would say on the campaign trail, perhaps with some personal storytelling or mild joking added in.

But it’s also often the shortest part.

Trump’s tangents aren’t new, nor is Trump’s penchant for elevating baseless ideas that most other presidential candidates wouldn’t, like his promotion of injecting bleach during the pandemic.

But in a presidential race among two old men that’s often focused on the age of the one who’s slightly older, these campaign trail antics shed light on Trump’s mental acuity, even if people tend to characterize them differently than Joe Biden’s. While Biden’s gaffes elicit serious scrutiny, as writers in the New Yorker and the New York Times recently noted, we’ve seemingly become inured to Trump’s brand of speaking, either skimming over it or giving him leeway because this has always been his shtick.

Trump, like Biden, has confused names of world leaders (but then claims it’s on purpose). He has also stumbled and slurred his words. But beyond that, Trump’s can take a different turn. Trump has described using an “iron dome” missile defense system as “ding, ding, ding, ding, ding, ding. They’ve only got 17 seconds to figure this whole thing out. Boom. OK. Missile launch. Whoosh. Boom.”

These tangents can be part of a tirade, or they can be what one can only describe as complete nonsense.

During this week’s Wisconsin speech, which was more coherent than usual, Trump pulled out a few frequent refrains: comparing himself, incorrectly, to Al Capone, saying he was indicted more than the notorious gangster; making fun of the Georgia prosecutor Fani Willis’s first name (“It’s spelled fanny like your ass, right? Fanny. But when she became DA, she decided to add a little French, a little fancy”).

He made fun of Biden’s golfing game, miming how Biden golfs, perhaps a ding back at Biden for poking Trump about his golf game. Later, he called Biden a “lost soul” and lamented that he gets to sit at the president’s desk. “Can you imagine him sitting at the Resolute Desk? What a great desk,” Trump said.

One muddled addition in Wisconsin involved squatters’ rights, a hot topic related to immigration now: “If you have illegal aliens invading your home, we will deport you,” presumably meaning the migrant would be deported instead of the homeowner. He wanted to create a federal taskforce to end squatting, he said.

“Sounds like a little bit of a weird topic but it’s not, it’s a very bad thing,” he said.

These half-cocked remarks aren’t new; they are a feature of who Trump is and how he communicates that to the public, and that’s key to understanding how he is as a leader.

The New York Times opinion writer Jamelle Bouie described it as “something akin to the soft bigotry of low expectations”, whereby no one expected him to behave in an orderly fashion or communicate well.

Some of these bizarre asides are best seen in full, like this one about Biden at the beach in Trump’s Georgia response to the State of the Union:

“Somebody said he looks great in a bathing suit, right? And you know, when he was in the sand and he was having a hard time lifting his feet through the sand, because you know sand is heavy, they figured three solid ounces per foot, but sand is a little heavy, and he’s sitting in a bathing suit. Look, at 81, do you remember Cary Grant? How good was Cary Grant, right? I don’t think Cary Grant, he was good. I don’t know what happened to movie stars today. We used to have Cary Grant and Clark Gable and all these people. Today we have, I won’t say names, because I don’t need enemies. I don’t need enemies. I got enough enemies. But Cary Grant was, like – Michael Jackson once told me, ‘The most handsome man, Trump, in the world.’ ‘Who?’ ‘Cary Grant.’ Well, we don’t have that any more, but Cary Grant at 81 or 82, going on 100. This guy, he’s 81, going on 100. Cary Grant wouldn’t look too good in a bathing suit, either. And he was pretty good-looking, right?”

Or another Hollywood-related bop, inspired by a rant about Willis and special prosecutor Nathan Wade’s romantic relationship:

“It’s a magnificent love story, like Gone With the Wind. You know Gone With the Wind, you’re not allowed to watch it any more. You know that, right? It’s politically incorrect to watch Gone With the Wind. They have a list. What were the greatest movies ever made? Well, Gone With the Wind is usually number one or two or three. And then they have another list you’re not allowed to watch any more, Gone With the Wind. You tell me, is our country screwed up?”

He still claims to have “done more for Black people than any president other than Abraham Lincoln” and also now says he’s being persecuted more than Lincoln and Andrew Jackson:

All my life you’ve heard of Andrew Jackson, he was actually a great general and a very good president. They say that he was persecuted as president more than anybody else, second was Abraham Lincoln. This is just what they said. This is in the history books. They were brutal, Andrew Jackson’s wife actually died over it.”

You not only see the truly bizarre nature of his speeches when viewing them in full, but you see the sheer breadth of his menace and animus toward those who disagree with him.

His comments especially toward migrants have grown more dehumanizing. He has said they are “poisoning the blood” of the US – a nod at Great Replacement Theory, the far-right conspiracy that the left is orchestrating migration to replace white people. Trump claimed the people coming in were “prisoners, murderers, drug dealers, mental patients and terrorists, the worst they have”. He has repeatedly called migrants “animals”.

“Democrats said please don’t call them ‘animals’. I said, no, they’re not humans, they’re animals,” he said during a speech in Michigan this week.

“In some cases they’re not people, in my opinion,” he said during his March appearance in Ohio. “But I’m not allowed to say that because the radical left says that’s a terrible thing to say. “These are animals, OK, and we have to stop it,” he said.

And he has turned more authoritarian in his language, saying he would be a “dictator on day one” but then later said it would only be for a day. He’s called his political enemies “vermin”: “We pledge to you that we will root out the communists, Marxists, fascists and the radical left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country,” he said in New Hampshire in late 2023.

At a speech in March in Ohio about the US auto industry he claimed there would be a “bloodbath” if he lost, which some interpreted as him claiming there would be violence if he loses the election.

Trump’s campaign said later that he meant the comment to be specific to the auto industry, but now the former president has started saying Biden created a “border bloodbath” and the Republican National Committee created a website to that effect as well.

It’s tempting to find a coherent line of attack in Trump speeches to try to distill the meaning of a rambling story. And it’s sometimes hard to even figure out the full context of what he’s saying, either in text or subtext and perhaps by design, like the “bloodbath” comment or him saying there wouldn’t be another election if he doesn’t win this one.

But it’s only in seeing the full breadth of the 2024 Trump speech that one can truly understand what kind of president he could become if he won the election.

“It’s easiest to understand the threat that Trump poses to American democracy most clearly when you see it for yourself,” Susan B Glasser wrote in the New Yorker. “Small clips of his craziness can be too easily dismissed as the background noise of our times.”

But if you ask Trump himself, these are just examples that Trump is smart, he says.

“The fake news will say, ‘Oh, he goes from subject to subject.’ No, you have to be very smart to do that. You got to be very smart. You know what it is? It’s called spot-checking. You’re thinking about something when you’re talking about something else, and then you get back to the original. And they go, ‘Holy shit. Did you see what he did?’ It’s called intelligence.”

Read the whole story
iridesce
9 days ago
reply
DC
Share this story
Delete

It’s Not What the World Needs Right Now | Andrew Norman Wilson

1 Share

It’s 2016. I’m a contemporary artist and have been living off of Medicaid, food stamps, and $20k annually since graduating from art school five years ago. I see the return policies offered by Bezos and the Waltons as loan agreements; I lend them $1,500, and the interest they pay is my use of a new hard drive. While TurboTaxing I hallucinate a DJ software skin and use the expense estimate sliders as fraud modulators. I accept unpaid exhibition offers from salaried curators and gallerists in far-flung cities and tack on lecture stops at $150 a pop, spending as much time as possible as a guest in circulation so as to avoid paying rent anywhere.

This hustle will continue for five more years, but right now I feel like I’m going blue-chip because I’m about to show new videos in four different biennials. One of these new videos—Ode to Seekers 2012—is a loose adaptation of Keats’s “Ode on a Grecian Urn” and depicts 3D animated mosquitos, syringes, and oil pumps sucking and fucking a surface that looks, alternately, like human skin under a microscope, desert salt flats, or potato casserole. Set to a remix I had made of Icona Pop’s “I Love It,” the video is celebratory in tone, freeing me from what I’ve begun to call the “cottage industry of critical art,” [1] an echo chamber/conference room in which overeducated tryhards attempt to outperform each other with the most perfect politics possible. The video doesn’t have a point; it’s more like a knot.

These biennials will ultimately amount to a deficit due to their meager production budgets, but FedEx loses my Robin Williams Window Shade sculpture, and I collect $9,000 in insurance value. New York increasingly feels like a sexy jail or a 9/11-themed Sbarro, so I use the money to buy a 2000 Volvo S70 with 250,000 miles on it for $500 from my dad, who likes to fix up totaled jalopies with his friend. The AC’s cooked, but the summer is my window of opportunity, so I head west in late June to become an “LA Artist,” which to me is an indicator that one has achieved adequate exposure and now needs time and space to focus on commissions to come.

In LA I realize it’s impossible to get a lease when your income is an insurance money bonanza and three €150 checks from European art schools. But I also realize that if I answer, “How are you?” with “Fine . . . I’m looking for a place to stay,” everyone knows someone who needs a plant sitter. Rather than seeing the crust punk through the Lacoste or realizing that my storage unit is my car trunk, people seem to think I’m a rich kid with a Volvo quirk. Looking like gay Abe Lincoln probably helps.

In September I go to South Korea to show Ode to Seekers 2012 at the Gwangju Biennial. The beast mode I typically find myself in during the install-to-opening phase intensifies into a full-blown mania. At the press preview, I take too much Adderall and start crying when asked what art is, tears that imply the inability of language to account for the sublime. I watch my piece over and over and decide my next project will be a 3D animated Humpty Dumpty video drawing from Lewis Carroll and James Joyce.

Back in LA I’m confronted with the reality that there will be no champagne receptions, boutique hotel rooms, or complimentary car service for the foreseeable future. Instead, I live in a four bedroom on the far east side with five to nine other artists. A former student visits and introduces me to his wife and baby. I introduce him to a few of my twenty-three-year-old roommates and two guys who slept in the shed last night.

I work on my laptop in my bedroom, so when the online art brokerage platform Artsy asks to photograph me in my studio for a “Top Emerging Artists of 2016” listicle, I lie and say that I have Emirati collector-patrons who let me live and work in their long-term rental on the RMS Queen Mary, the retired British ocean liner-turned-hotel in the port of Long Beach. I rent a suite for the day of the shoot. The photographer is very curious about my live/work situation, which unbeknownst to her, I’ve only had for two hours. I tell her my patron’s daughter Abitha is still asleep in my room, and the whole family will get upset if we disturb her, so we should just take photos of me on the deck.

It’s 2017. A friend of a friend offers me a room in his grandmother’s mansion for $900 a month, which includes a private balcony over the pool. Grandma lives in a nursing home, so it’s just me and this married couple living with her massive art collection. I feel like I’ve won a WASP LARPer lottery. Someone tips off Barneys New York about the boho-chic lifestyle I’ve assumed at Grandma’s, and they reach out to interview and photograph me for their fall catalog. I ask a model what they would get paid for a shoot and propose $2,000 to Barney’s. They reject my proposal and offer a $1,000 gift card. I discover a website that will turn the encrypted plastic into $940 cash and accept.

I line all four walls of my studio with pictures of Barney the dinosaur impersonators and tell the interviewer that I’m working on a new project as a follow-up to my 2016 video The Unthinkable Bygone, in which a 3D model of Baby Sinclair from Jim Henson’s animatronic puppet TV series Dinosaurs (1991–1994) is subjected to simulation, dissection, reflection, and endoscopy. I say I’m interested in pop cultural representations of the surfaces of dinosaurs, and how we hollow out the earth to find dinosaur bones, and then use those bones, along with our knowledge of current species, to literally flesh out vivid caricatures about our unthinkable earthly predecessors. That bit doesn’t run in the interview, but every photo he takes is full of bootleg Barneys.

To others my new life seems like it’s all fun and games, but in actuality I’m miserable. The maxim “money doesn’t buy happiness” starts to ring in my head. Not because I actually have money, but because I’m living with the material comforts of someone who does, and it doesn’t seem to make me feel any better. I have the ugly feeling that an Artforum feature, institutional acquisitions, and another lap around the art world circuit would cure this sense of lack.

But Trump is in office, and my work is deemed less “urgent”—“irresponsible,” even. A curator who selected me for an Art Basel commission ghosts me. A gallerist who wants to work with me says she can’t add a white man to her roster. An esteemed curator from the Middle East tells me I should probably get a day job for a while because my career outlook in the art world is bleak. It becomes trendy to believe that images within contemporary art contexts can directly achieve the goals of political struggle. The proliferation of bad faith gestures toward political change and the aestheticized consumption of other people’s suffering sickens me, especially when these expressions still play into the financial objectives of oil barons, arms dealers, and other vampires.

It’s 2018. I’m in Hasselt, Belgium. Everything I eat is off-white, including a Koninginnehapje, a puffed pastry tower filled with boiled chicken balls and cream. I’m there to install a video at an institution called KRIEG? about my father’s thirty-three-year career as a Kodak technician. Last year a respected curator convinced me to make the work, citing “emergent image regimes,” “immaterial labor,” and other terms she probably pulled from PDFs she read in grad school. I took the bait for funding’s sake and spent the next year toiling in Adobe Creative Suite. I should have stood my barren ground and made something from the heart.

I decide I need a vision quest. I google “best beaches in the world” and look for one that I can convince KRIEG? to fly me to on my way back to Los Angeles. I settle on Balandra Beach in La Paz, Mexico, find a subletter for my room at Grandma’s, and book an apartment for a month of fuego pálido.

I take a snorkeling excursion in the Gulf of California to Isla Espíritu Santo, which is inhabited by thousands of sea lions. As I track a manta ray fifty feet below me, something nudges my elbow. I turn to find a sea lion pup swimming alongside me. We make eye contact. He winks, then accelerates past me toward an underwater arch. I follow him through the opening, and when I surface for air, I find myself surrounded by adult sea lions. They gaze at me, motionless. I have a feeling I might die. I’ve found what I was looking for on this island. Something that feels like the opposite of scrutinizing a nondescript object in a white room and then having to read a citation-heavy press release to find out that the object is the product of prison labor, and prison labor is bad.

At Princeton that fall I’m the token artist at an art history symposium. Delirious and jet-lagged, I quietly observe the graduate students as they grovel for the academic superstars they’ve flown in to present papers on the “Limits of Analogy in the Wake of the Social Turn in Art” and “Predicated Internationalism.” Instead of the pseudoacademic presentation I prepared, I spew raw accounts of my artistic process into the room. The superstars eat it up like seabirds.

Suddenly I’m the star. I get overconfident and pound shots with a Penn professor, then snort powders with a grad student. I’m quickly too far gone and take an Uber back to my hotel alone. When the receptionist checked me into the Hyatt Regency earlier that day, I was told the general manager used to be a production designer. The brass penguins stoically wading around the sandstone and marble mezzanine waterfall suggest Inception meets Lost in Translation meets Happy Feet. One of them sits loosely on its mount, so I pick it up and start walking.

A hotel employee approaches me and asks about the penguin. I don’t know what I’m doing. I tell her that, and she calls her supervisor. By the time the supervisor arrives, a thought emerges: I’m dissociating. But something about the way I address that thought out loud gets the supervisor going on about the police. The adrenaline hits, and I start to remember I have some cards to play. I’ve been teaching as an adjunct at UCLA, so I can say I’m a professor. I’m in town for a conference at Princeton. I’m jet-lagged from a site visit to a German Kunstverein. I hand her the brass penguin and plead insanity. She wants me to pack my bags and leave the premises, but I have no money and nowhere else to go. She doesn’t buy that a professor can’t afford a hotel room in New Jersey and tells me I can choose to sleep in jail or a mental hospital. I choose the latter.

In the morning, a psychiatrist tells me I’m not insane but sends me back to LA with a set of goals. I’m going to slow down. Drink less. Start therapy. Get serious about meditation. When I return home, the married couple tells me I have to move out of Grandma’s mansion because they no longer want a roommate.

It’s 2019. A clan of Italian businessmen who collect video art offers me $8,000 to make a new video for an important institutional solo show. At $4,000 less than the going rate for my .movs, this is a raw deal, but I don’t have better offers. The Princeton psychiatrist’s instructions prove unfeasible as I burn through housesits. In Koreatown, the papillon I’m taking care of sprains her ankle doing zoomies. In Los Feliz, rats eat through my Volvo’s fuel sensor wiring. For two weeks, I ride an old mountain bike around like a repeat DUI offender to demeaning little gigs like cleaning the floor of an art gallery. An opportunity to catsit my friend Dena’s Scottish Fold in Chinatown opens up, so I escape to New York. Back in sexy jail, I’m so poor that I toy with the idea of posting my banking login info as a publicity stunt: having $0 isn’t going to make life that much harder than having $11. When hunger strikes around noon some days, I order a coffee at a posh restaurant and pay immediately; when another diner leaves leftovers, I bag them and scurry out.

I fly Spirit to Chicago, where all my friends are too busy buying property or accepting professorships to try the ketamine a guy gave me for letting him suck my dick. I catsit for my friend Eli, who is set for life thanks to his role as the brains behind Cards Against Humanity. The cat mauls the papier-mâché Pikachu I made for the video. I’m on the verge of a nervous breakdown preparing for the shoot, where I’ll play producer, director, art director, prop master, PA, and driver. But the labor proves fruitful when I realize Z = |Z/Z•Z-1 mod 2|-1 is a work of almost palpable infinity—which is to say, one of the best things I’ve ever made. When it’s time to exhibit the work, I don’t have any budget left over to pay for housing in Milan. A curator arranges for a residency at an art hostel called Combo in Navigli under the condition that I curate a program of films, which I present in the laundry room. After the show opens, I wander around town listening to Fiona Apple through noise-canceling headphones and look at luxury clothing I can’t afford. Four art magazines publish reviews that read like whispers of a secret society speaking in code.

It’s 2020. I’ve moved to New York to teach at Cooper Union. I tumble through three short-term sublets and then stick the landing: a $1,400 1.5 bedroom a block away from Cooper Square. Everyone’s stealing from Barneys New York. The department store is going out of business and has replaced their staff with indifferent temp employees. I put on a shimmering $4,000 Prada suit in the dressing room, pull my regular clothes over it, and walk out of the store.

I’m selected as a finalist for a professorship at the State Academy of Fine Arts in Stuttgart, Germany, though the call for applications listed a preference for female candidates. German teaching jobs are the golden ticket of the academic art world. I would start at $90k per year even though it’s effectively part-time—so part-time I wouldn’t have to live in Stuttgart—and I’d have the same pension plan as Angela Merkel. I arrive on campus in my shimmering suit to compete with the other two finalists. After my talk three faculty pick me apart: I don’t live in Germany, my exhibition schedule is too busy to devote sufficient time to my students, and I’m male. While it’s easy to rebut the first two accusations, there’s not much I can say about the third.

Back in New York, a global pandemic takes hold. My rentier cancels his cross-
country bike trip and kicks me out of his apartment. I fly back to LA and finish teaching remotely from a housesit in Echo Park. None of my students seem to be able to make art anymore. Meanwhile, I compulsively spend at least twelve hours a day stitching together clips from commercial cinema of the eighties and nineties to make a narrative video about the urban legend behind Phil Collins’s “In the Air Tonight.” The budget amounts to $400 total to pay the narrator. My mom says it’s the best thing I’ve ever done. The curators I send it to mostly respond with politely veiled indifference; one even says it’s “not what the world needs right now.” I release it on the Phil Collins subreddit.

I’m awarded an artist residency at La Becque on Lake Geneva. Switzerland grants me a business travelers’ permit based on the (false) premise that I would shoot a film with a Swiss cast and crew. In actuality, I have no money, and no idea what I’ll make. The week before leaving I start a sequel to Z = |Z/Z•Z-1 mod 2|-1 called Art Director and spend every hour of daylight documenting how Hollywood fantasies are made material throughout LA—as if the residents desire to live amid set constructions and movie characters. I shoot Bavarian shopping plazas, an animatronic dinosaur car wash, and a “Native American”-themed Taiwanese restaurant.

While at La Becque, I secure €20,000 from an obscure Czech arts organization for Art Director. A curator at the Centre Pompidou informs me that the project will be proposed as a grant-funded exhibition at an upcoming meeting. I start assembling a team. We’ll shoot from a Jeep Wrangler with a camera mounted in the back like a gatling gun. Suddenly the visual director of Balenciaga reaches out and asks if I want to direct their next series of campaign videos. The team essentially wants to pay me $100k to remake Z = |Z/Z•Z-1 mod 2|-1 with Balenciaga products.

A week before we’re about to shoot, Europe goes into its second lockdown, and the campaign is postponed until March. I decide I’ll shoot Art Director when I return to LA in January, then go back to Europe in March for Balenciaga. Days later, I get an email informing me that the Czech program has been Covid-canceled. Then I hear back from the curator at the Pompidou. Apparently two (American) committee members vetoed the project because it didn’t address LA’s homeless population. I’ll be homeless in LA if I return, so I extend my stay in Switzerland.

I had gotten into high-intensity interval training early on in the pandemic because it seemed like I could get canceled for jogging outside. On a cold November day, while writhing around on the floor for a move called “cross-lateral bicycle kicks,” I feel a sharp pain in my abdomen and an immediate wave of crippling nausea. I crawl into bed and remain there for the next two days. When I emerge, the nausea persists, and I can no longer digest food properly.

For as long as I can remember, one of my floating ribs has protruded out of my abdomen like a baby finger. Though it points in the opposite direction of my innards, it’s rather mobile, and I suspect it could have pinched my intestines. A Swiss doctor says he’ll have to run a bunch of tests and I should wait to begin my “medical adventure” once I’m back home.

I try to frame the rest of my time in Switzerland as convalescence. Swimming in the thirty-five-degree water offers me an hour of relief, but the holidays are approaching, and it’s offensive to refuse all the fondue and white wine. I suffer through protracted dinners as residents suggest diseases I’ve never thought about: Crohn’s, peptic ulcers, diverticulitis, celiac disease. While googling them one evening, a Sundance programmer calls me. He says they want to show In the Air Tonight at next year’s festival. “Get your pitch decks ready,” he says. When I send the deck for Art Director, the team tells me the project is “beyond arthouse” and that I should come up with an idea for a narrative short.

It’s 2021. I rent a medieval-themed Airbnb/Peerspace in Burbank at a fraction of its usual cost because LA is currently the global epicenter of Covid. I get my food holes inspected at a shadowy Medicaid-accepted facility called the Airport Endoscopy Center. The Capitol is stormed, so I watch a lot of cable television as I wait for Balenciaga, Sundance, and MyChart results. I see Ariel Pink strung out at Tierra Mia in Highland Park and then on TV getting interviewed by Tucker Carlson.

A January chill besets LA, so I start wearing the winter attire included in the Sundance swag bag alongside an Oculus Rift. The image of me sporting an IMDb beanie and a Canada Goose jacket in a medieval-themed sharing economy rental is lost at the virtual industry events, where my body is rendered as a Sundance-branded 3D figure with a 2D image of my face in place of a head. Everyone else’s avatars meet up with friends from film school, previous shoots, and past networking events. I dawdle in the floating space lounge by myself, thinking, They don’t know I was just diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome.

Other festivals reach out about my “Sundance film,” as do companies like Searchlight and A24. One of the Nomadland producers calls me; instead of saying hello, he yells, “WHO is this Andrew Norman Wilson everyone’s talking about?” My pitches of my short film idea Impersonator—about a Hollywood Boulevard character impersonator who drifts deeper into the fantasy of their character—are deemed feral.

I wander around on foot to prepare the short because driving my Volvo makes me nauseous. I meet a Stormtrooper impersonator on the boulevard named Dante Valentine who plays in a hair metal band and founded what he describes as a “life coaching program” for “Asian businessmen” who want to become pickup artists. While walking around the LA River, I meet a man named Tony who makes a living fixing bikes and trading them to other people who live on the streets. In a past life he worked in McMansion construction, was wrongfully accused of a crime, spent years in prison, and upon release, fell into debt. I find an affinity with both of them; Dante because of his parasitic relationship to financial elites, Tony because I may be trading him Volvo parts for a bike soon.

I’m forced to make way for another tenant at the medieval-themed Airbnb and end up tortoise/turtle/iguana/dove/koi-sitting in Laurel Canyon for a German commercial director. Every morning, I wake up and hurl $20 worth of vegetables around the property for the pets before spending eighteen hours preparing my short film. I fly my parents out to help me because it’s cheaper than hiring PAs. I can’t think straight due to the chronic nausea, and it seems like I’m spending $50 per second on set. At the end of the shoot, I’m $40k in debt and severely constipated.

I have a bunch of cops’ phone numbers, both to research their procedures and because I had to hire real cops to make sure the fake cops in the movie weren’t frisking actual citizens or pulling them over in the LAPD truck we rented. I have never engaged with the world so deeply as an artist.

Back in the canyon, one of the tortoises I’m watching—Hollywood—is unconscious. I flip him over and find that he’s bleeding from his penis. Animal control asks if Hollywood lives with a female tortoise. I tell them her name is Blaze. “Is she bigger than him?” they ask. “Yes,” I say. “Are they sexually active?” Hollywood spends every waking moment trying to fuck the living daylights out of her. There’s the explanation: Blaze broke Hollywood’s dick off, and now he’s dead.

I call the German commercial director. He’s devastated and needs time to think. Awaiting further instruction, I put Hollywood’s corpse in a black trash bag and leave him in the shade. Three days later the German returns. We bury Hollywood in a massive hole in the ground, and I move out.

Too sick to hustle for housesits like I used to, I decide to move into my parent’s two-bedroom ranch house in North Carolina, where I file for disability and set up a whole new stable of doctors to administer obscure tests. I consume radioactive eggs from a paper cup for a gastric emptying study so they can shoot gamma rays at my intestines to track the movement of the egg down my chute. I buy a George H. W. Bush baseball card that depicts him at age ninety-one throwing out the first pitch at an Astros game. I tell my mom and dad that he’s my spirit animal. My mom says her friend’s daughter said white people can’t have spirit animals. My dad, who voted for Bush twice, asks where my wife is.

The only being I’m really vibing with in the house is my mom’s rabbit, Ziggles. He approaches me with a gentle curiosity whenever I enter the sunroom. He lets me style him with tiny sunglasses and sit him upright like a little man to watch the subtitled films my parents complain about. Nine months pass down there. I start writing a feature-length script based on Impersonator. Logline: a fugitive hacker hiding as a Hollywood Boulevard impersonator is recruited by a rogue FBI agent for a black-ops mission to steal millions from a debauched doomsday prepper’s desert compound.

It’s 2022. My therapist suggests I take a trip to see friends because I keep calling myself an incel. I have a feeling she’s sick of watching a grown man cry about how hard it is to poop and wants new material. I accept a designer cat-sitting gig in Brooklyn and find that the affection of old friends distracts me from my condition. But city life becomes untenable as winter turns to spring. A close friend in the throes of baby panic seduces me into a relationship and then berates me for two months because of the glaring reality that I’m unfit to be a dad. I take three editing gigs with fixed fees that factor out to less than $10 per hour in the end. I can’t take the train or look at my phone while walking without becoming nauseous for twenty-four hours, can’t drink alcohol or stay up past nine, and can’t follow through on half of the plans I make. Meeting the film producers, creative directors, and agents I need to know feels impossible. I start to compose a suicide note and procure twenty Xanax from a friend.

Then, an electric signal jolts me out of the murk. I receive an invitation to a director’s lab called Oxbelly run by a powerful film producer and held at a Greek resort. I fly out with my Impersonator script for a week of meetings, workshops, and production exercises. All the other fellows have film school pasts and industry experience, rendering me a bit of an enigma. A famous actor who I call the Green Goblin seems to like this. He accidentally pulls up a picture of his wife’s breasts when he’s trying to show me a picture of his goat. I return home motivated to start a new script based on a love triangle set in Switzerland.

Googling medical conditions, I find something I’ve never heard of before: Slipping rib syndrome. There’s a Facebook advocacy group with six thousand members, and everyone seems to be talking about three surgeons. Medicaid will cover the one in Connecticut. Three months later, I go in for surgery to sew the “hypermobile floating rib” to my ribcage to keep it from poking my intestines. When I wake up from the anesthesia, the surgeon says the rib popped out and pointed forward when he opened me up, so he decided instead to saw off three inches. I request the bone. The surgeon refuses. “It’s a biohazard,” he says. I ask every nurse and PA I see, and they say taking body parts home is illegal.

Two days later, I return to the hospital to sort out an issue with my OxyContin prescription. The surgeon says he’ll come meet me. When he arrives at my table in the cafeteria, he puts a urine sample container in front of me. Inside it is my rib, with meat still attached to the bone, sitting in hydrogen peroxide. He tells me to leave it in there for a week until the meat dissolves.

My digestive issues improve, and I have a new lease on life. No one wants to listen to an artist describe their work, but everyone wants to be told my rib story. I tell them God will use the bone to create a third gender. Even if it doesn’t work out between this new being and me, I’m able to autofellate. I now have half an hourglass figure and, naturally, am starting an OnlyFans. I will work my angles, pay off my medical debt, and pivot to directing Hollywood blockbusters.

It’s 2023. Crapping is easy now; sometimes too easy. While the same can’t be said for making money, I haven’t been this liquid for quite some time. I shoot a skincare advertisement featuring Hailey Bieber draped across a giant pink bean; a music video for U2 at an abandoned housing development of over seven hundred cheap French chateau replicas in rural Turkey; and two music videos for Oneohtrix Point Never that feel more like my work than promotional content.

Meanwhile, I feel like a retired contemporary artist. My .mov files are entombed in the collections of institutions such as MoMA, the Getty, and the Pompidou, but I haven’t had a studio visit in years. I’ve given up on trying to get projects such as Art Director and Humpty Dumpty funded or looking for teaching jobs. I avoid openings and even gallery exhibitions altogether.

I used to think being an artist would allow me to step beyond reason toward what ought to be, to disturb the seemingly natural order of things and unwind our counterfeit intuitions. But I’m fairly certain that the art world—caught as it is between the demands of yacht owners and delusional incompetents with advanced deskilling degrees—won’t let me do so. Instead, I’ll defect and let others get bullied into making evangelical pablum, financial instruments, interior decor, identity flags, conceptual contracts, tech demos, checked boxes, “research,” encrypted Marxism, postcolonial apologia, excuses, complaints . . .

It’s 2024. I’m getting close to shooting that romantic thriller in Switzerland. Logline: in the Swiss town of Interlaken, a love triangle forms between an avalanche survivor, a newly broke oil industrialist’s son, and a mysterious influencer who might be a spy. The fate of humanity hangs in the balance.

I write this series of vignettes as part of my attempt to achieve escape velocity from the predicament described herein. The compensation exceeds any fee I’ve received for an exhibition. Its audience will be larger, and it will always be available to them. This magazine famously ran a piece decrying the nonfiction-to-film pipeline, [2] but I wouldn’t mind it if this was optioned, so any curious scouts should reach out: [email protected].

[1] Andrew Norman Wilson, “The Artist Leaving the Googleplex,” e-flux, June 2016

[2] James Pogue, “They Made a Movie Out of It,” The Baffler no. 49, January 2020

Read the whole story
iridesce
10 days ago
reply
DC
Share this story
Delete

They came for Florida’s sun and sand. They got soaring costs and a culture war.

1 Comment and 2 Shares

IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Read the whole story
acdha
16 days ago
reply
“Having grown up in Oklahoma, Smith considered herself a Republican, but as Florida’s politics shifted to the right, she said she began to consider herself a Democrat. It wasn’t until the past several years, though, that politics started to encroach on her daily life — from feuds between neighbors and friends to neo-Nazis showing up at a Black Lives Matter rally in her small town.”
Washington, DC
iridesce
15 days ago
reply
DC
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories